BELEDİYE POLİTİKALARININ KENT MEKÂNININ BİÇİMLENMESİNDEKİ ROLÜ: ANKARA ÖRNEĞİ
Files
Date
2012-07-25
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Son zamanlarda adından sıkça söz edilen yerel yönetimlerin önemi
giderek artmaktadır ve büyük bir kesim tarafından demokrasinin beşiği gibi
görülmektedir. Halka sunduğu hizmetler açısından en geniş yetki alanına
sahip olan belediyeler, politikaları ile kentleri biçimlendirmektedir.
Merkezi yönetimin planlama politikaları üzerinde doğrudan belirleyici
etkisi bulunmaktadır. Belediyeler bu planları uygulayarak kentleri biçimlendirir.
Sosyo-ekonomik politikaların belediye uygulamalarına doğrudan etkisi
bulunmaktadır. Mekânın bir meta olarak yeniden üretilmesi toprak rantı
kavramını ortaya çıkarmaktadır.
Rantların kaynağı toplumlardaki üretim (mülkiyet) ve bölüşüm
ilişkilerindedir. Devlet planlar aracılığı ile kent merkezi üzerinde yaratılan rant
kavgasını uzlaştırır. Dünyada yaşanan gelişmeler özellikle 80’li yıllarda
kendisini göstermiş, 70’li yıllarda yaşanan dünya ekonomik kriziyle
savaşmaya çalışan sermaye devreye küreselleşmeyi sokmuştur. Bu sayede
ekonominin globalleşmesi sağlanmıştır. Bu anlamda değişen sosyo ekonomik politikalar 1980 tarihini bir kırılma noktası yapmıştır.
Kazandırılmaya çalışılan Başkent kimliği ile Ankara kimi kesimlerce bir
laboratuvar ortamı gibi kullanılırken kimi kesimlerce de yeniliklerin öncüsü
olmuştur. Bu çalışmada, 1980 tarihinden günümüze kadar olan dönem
ağırlıklı olmak üzere, mevcut bulunan sosyo-ekonomik politikalar ile sahip
olunan merkezi hükümet politikaları doğrultusunda belediyelerin uygulamaları
çerçevesinde Ankara kenti irdelenmiştir.
Description
The role of Municipal Policies in setting urban site
formation: The Ankara Example
ABSTRACT: The importance of local governments increase gradually . Also, the local governments and municipalities are regarded as the genesis of democracy by the majority. Municipalities that have extensive authorities in terms of services which they fulfill towards the society , shape the cities through their policies. The central government possesses direct influence on planning policies. Municipalities form the cities by implementing these plans that are determined by the central government. Socio-economic policies also directy affect the practices local governments/municipalities. Transforming the land into a commercial asset creates the concept of the land benefit . The source of “land benefit ” is based on relationship between manifacture and participation in the society. The central government reconciles the struggle over the land benefit over the city centre through planning . Development over the world has become significant in the 80s; Capitalism, which struggled against the world economic crisis in the 70s, called “globalism” out. This way the globalization of the economy has been achieved. In that sense, Socio –economic policies that change in thar manner has done the year 1980 a point of break. Through the Identity of Capital City , Ankara has been used as laboratory by some segments of society , while It has been pioneer of developments for the others. In this study, the example of City of Ankara has been analyzed within the framework of municipal affairs ,in line with existing socio-economic policies and policies of central government .
ABSTRACT: The importance of local governments increase gradually . Also, the local governments and municipalities are regarded as the genesis of democracy by the majority. Municipalities that have extensive authorities in terms of services which they fulfill towards the society , shape the cities through their policies. The central government possesses direct influence on planning policies. Municipalities form the cities by implementing these plans that are determined by the central government. Socio-economic policies also directy affect the practices local governments/municipalities. Transforming the land into a commercial asset creates the concept of the land benefit . The source of “land benefit ” is based on relationship between manifacture and participation in the society. The central government reconciles the struggle over the land benefit over the city centre through planning . Development over the world has become significant in the 80s; Capitalism, which struggled against the world economic crisis in the 70s, called “globalism” out. This way the globalization of the economy has been achieved. In that sense, Socio –economic policies that change in thar manner has done the year 1980 a point of break. Through the Identity of Capital City , Ankara has been used as laboratory by some segments of society , while It has been pioneer of developments for the others. In this study, the example of City of Ankara has been analyzed within the framework of municipal affairs ,in line with existing socio-economic policies and policies of central government .
Keywords
public administration and political science